Welcome to the Finest Kine Aloha Friday blog

Just brass...

2026-04-13

Government by Tantrum: Trump’s Second Administration Is Not Leadership. It Is Vandalism.

There is a difference between hard-nosed government and childish government. Hard-nosed government can be ruthless, ideological, even cruel, but it still knows what government is for. It knows how power works, how institutions function, how alliances are maintained, how laws are written, and how consequences spread. What the Trump administration has delivered instead is government by impulse, government by grievance, government by post. It is not disciplined. It is not serious. It is not strategic. It is a permanent adolescent performance staged from behind the desk of the presidency, and the rest of the country is being forced to live inside the consequences. As of April 13, 2026, that includes a live U.S. blockade of Iran after weeks of war and a failed ceasefire effort.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-blockade-iran-will-be-major-military-endeavor-experts-say-2026-04-13

https://apnews.com/article/1ac50d0be7baebeb727cce72be4c9cdc

Start with the most basic question: can these people actually govern? The answer, again and again, is no. This White House has tried to rule by theatrics and emergency declarations, only to run into the brick wall of its own incompetence. The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s sweeping global tariffs in February, ruling that the emergency-powers law he invoked did not authorize tariffs at all. Even after that rebuke, the administration hurried into a new tariff scheme that judges are already scrutinizing for using trade law in ways that do not fit the facts the administration claims to be addressing. And when normal lawmaking fails, the administration has repeatedly sprinted to the Supreme Court’s emergency docket so often that Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the volume “unprecedented.” That is not a sign of confident governance. It is the behavior of a presidency that treats law as an inconvenience and improvisation as a management style.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-rejects-trumps-global-tariffs-2026-02-20

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-trade-court-weighs-legality-trump-10-global-tariff-2026-04-10

The same immaturity shows up in the administration’s treatment of the federal government itself. A serious administration learns where expertise matters and where capacity cannot simply be slashed for applause. Trump’s people have instead embraced mass layoffs, agency disruption, and headline-friendly cuts that weaken the machinery citizens actually rely on. The latest budget proposal would cut more than 9,400 TSA jobs and reduce the agency’s budget by about 20%, despite record passenger screening volumes and an already strained system. This is the governing philosophy of a sophomore who thinks every problem can be solved by kicking over the desk and calling it reform.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-proposes-cut-9400-tsa-workers-15-billion-budget-2026-04-06

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-can-continue-mass-firings-federal-workers-us-judge-rules-2025-02-20

And then there is the assault on the social safety net, one of the clearest moral indictments of this administration. Republican plans tied to Trump’s agenda have aimed for about $2 trillion in spending cuts while protecting massive tax reductions, with Medicaid and SNAP squarely in the danger zone. Reuters reported that Trump’s signed spending bill is expected to shrink Medicaid coverage and that CBO estimated the changes could leave 7.8 million more people uninsured by 2034. Separate USDA cuts hit food banks with roughly $1 billion in lost support, reducing produce, meat, and staple supplies for families already on the edge. In rural America, those cuts have rippled through both hungry households and the local farmers who supplied the food. This is not fiscal responsibility. It is taking a crowbar to the floorboards under poor families and calling it efficiency.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/what-us-social-spending-programs-could-be-hit-trump-tax-cuts-2025-02-26

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/trumps-spending-bill-will-likely-boost-costs-insurers-shrink-medicaid-coverage-2025-07-14

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-cuts-hit-struggling-food-banks-risking-hunger-low-income-americans-2025-03-25

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/federal-funding-cuts-ripple-through-heart-trump-country-2025-03-29

The ugliness of that agenda is not abstract. When Medicaid is squeezed, people skip treatment, delay prescriptions, and gamble with conditions that become more expensive and more dangerous later. When food-bank funding is cut, hunger does not become a talking point; it becomes supper not showing up. When child-care subsidies get capped and worker supports vanish, as local officials in Washington have already warned amid shifting federal responsibilities, families pay in stress, missed work, and impossible choices. Trumpism likes to dress this up as toughness. In practice it is cowardice: transferring pain downward because the people taking the hit have the least power to retaliate.

https://apnews.com/article/5b5bd004e1cf27225536396fac2abea5

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-cuts-hit-struggling-food-banks-risking-hunger-low-income-americans-2025-03-25

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/federal-funding-cuts-ripple-through-heart-trump-country-2025-03-29

The environmental record is just as reckless. In 2025, federal enforcement against polluters fell to a record low under Trump’s EPA. The administration repealed a stricter mercury rule that would have sharply reduced toxic emissions from coal plants. It also moved to repeal the 2009 “endangerment finding,” the scientific basis for regulating greenhouse gases, and wiped out federal vehicle greenhouse-gas standards in the process. Reuters described this as the administration’s most sweeping climate rollback yet. Another Reuters report showed how the administration weakened clean-air rules in order to support surging electricity demand, leaving already polluted places such as St. Louis exposed to worse air and higher health costs. This is not deregulation in the noble sense. It is permission for powerful interests to dump more risk into everybody else’s lungs, water, and future.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-environmental-enforcement-by-trumps-epa-drops-record-low-2026-02-05

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/health-environmental-groups-sue-epa-rollback-mercury-rule-2026-03-30

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/us-epa-reconsider-biden-clean-power-plant-rule-2025-03-12

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/trump-administration-set-revoke-basis-us-climate-regulation-2026-02-12

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/how-ai-boom-derailed-cleanair-efforts-one-americas-most-polluted-cities-2026-04-10


On the world stage, Trump has done something that would have seemed impossible a generation ago: he has made the United States look less like the anchor of an alliance system and more like an unstable relative everyone now plans around. After Trump announced the blockade around Iran, NATO allies including Britain and France refused to join it. Turkey’s foreign minister said NATO should use its July summit to “reset” relations with Trump and prepare for a possible reduction in U.S. participation. That is not what trust looks like. Add to that the administration’s dismantling of USAID and the role U.S. cuts played in a sharp decline in global development aid, and the picture gets worse: fewer friends, less moral authority, and a world that increasingly treats Washington as erratic, transactional, and unreliable.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nato-allies-refuse-join-trumps-strait-hormuz-blockade-2026-04-13

https://www.reuters.com/world/turkey-says-nato-should-reset-ties-with-trump-next-summit-prepare-future-2026-04-13

https://www.reuters.com/world/wealthy-nations-slashed-development-aid-2025-second-year-row-debt-group-says-2026-04-08

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-missions-review-aid-programs-compliance-with-new-rules-abortion-diversity-2026-01-29

Trump’s defenders often say he is merely “blunt,” as though vulgarity were a synonym for honesty. It is not. His communication style is not refreshingly candid. It is vile, degrading, and corrosive. In the Iran crisis he threatened that “a whole civilization will die tonight,” language so extreme that Pope Leo publicly condemned it as “truly unacceptable.” AP also reported that experts said Trump’s threats to destroy civilian infrastructure such as power plants and bridges could implicate the laws of war. Days earlier, Trump threatened to jail a reporter over coverage of an airman rescue unless the reporter revealed a source. That is not strength. It is thuggery in a suit, a presidency that confuses intimidation with eloquence and menace with leadership.

https://apnews.com/article/758eb5cd680d7d275c4e1c38b2e01e6d

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/pope-leo-calls-trumps-threat-against-iran-truly-unacceptable-2026-04-07

https://apnews.com/article/88b8ca1bc8e5cc8adabaf6c34e93e597

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/trump-threatens-jail-reporter-who-revealed-iran-airman-rescue-2026-04-06

Then there is the grift, the smell that hangs over this administration like cigar smoke in a back room. Associated Press reported today that Trump’s family business empire has expanded aggressively during his second term through foreign real-estate deals, crypto ventures, and projects tied to government-linked entities abroad, while Trump’s personal fortune has climbed to an estimated $6.3 billion. Reuters separately reported that entities behind Trump’s meme coin brought in nearly $100 million in trading fees in less than two weeks, even as many small traders lost money. Another Reuters report said the Justice Department’s senior ethics official resigned after being sidelined by the administration. Even when the conduct does not fit neatly into a criminal charge, the ethical picture is plain enough: this is a presidency marinated in conflicts, self-enrichment, and the steady conversion of public office into private leverage.

https://apnews.com/article/863d8850f536df291391e949ba1bc00e

https://www.reuters.com/markets/currencies/trumps-meme-coin-made-nearly-100-million-trading-fees-small-traders-lost-money-2025-02-03

https://www.reuters.com/legal/senior-justice-department-ethics-official-resigns-over-sidelining-by-trump-2025-02-19

None of this would be possible without a Congress that has largely abandoned its constitutional role. On Iran, AP reported that Trump took the United States to war without a vote of support from Congress, and Senate Republicans voted down an effort to halt the campaign. On domestic policy, congressional Republicans have advanced the very spending-and-tax architecture that puts Medicaid, SNAP, and other supports on the chopping block. Even the Supreme Court had to remind Trump that tariff authority belongs to Congress, a branch that too often behaves as though its job is not to legislate or check abuses, but to applaud after the fact. At some point “acquiescence” becomes too gentle a word. Participation is the more honest one.

https://apnews.com/article/iran-war-powers-exit-strategy-congress-trump-781ef538fbb493cf0973c6a89698f36e

https://apnews.com/article/iran-war-marco-rubio-middle-east-9b9dfac9c40c8cf171e229e0a0a6980f

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/what-us-social-spending-programs-could-be-hit-trump-tax-cuts-2025-02-26

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-rejects-trumps-global-tariffs-2026-02-20

And that brings us to the Iran war itself, the final and most dangerous expression of this entire political style. Reuters reported that the war began on February 28 and that, after a brief ceasefire, Trump has now ordered a blockade of Iranian ports and threatened to destroy Iranian fast-attack craft that approach it. Experts told Reuters that the blockade will be a major, open-ended military endeavor with serious geopolitical risks, including retaliation, oil shocks, and strain with allies who are already refusing to follow Washington’s lead. This is the distilled essence of Trumpism: launch first, improvise later, threaten the most catastrophic outcome possible, then call the chaos proof of strength. But war is not a branding exercise. Real people die, economies convulse, alliances fracture, and the costs keep coming long after the applause line is gone.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-he-has-agreed-suspend-bombing-attack-iran-two-weeks-2026-04-07

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-blockade-iran-will-be-major-military-endeavor-experts-say-2026-04-13

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-iranian-fast-attack-ships-that-come-close-us-blockade-will-be-2026-04-13

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nato-allies-refuse-join-trumps-strait-hormuz-blockade-2026-04-13

So let’s say it plainly. Trump is not failing because he is too bold. He is failing because he is too shallow. He approaches government like a man who never outgrew the thrill of domination, who mistakes humiliation for persuasion and destruction for accomplishment. He and the people around him are not restoring American greatness; they are degrading American competence, American decency, American credibility, and American safety. They are hollowing out the social contract at home while torching trust abroad. And the members of Congress who still bow their heads, mouth their excuses, and wave this on are not bystanders to the damage. They are co-authors of it.

That is the story of this administration: sophomoric governance, cruelty toward the vulnerable, contempt for the planet, humiliation of the country, speech soaked in ugliness, self-dealing without shame, a Congress that acts like an accessory, and now a war with Iran that could spiral further because the people in charge confuse escalation with genius. History is not likely to remember that as strength. It is far more likely to remember it as a grotesque failure of character wearing the costume of power.

If this troubles you like it does me, get going, contact your Senators and Representatives...

https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm?Class=1

https://www.house.gov/representatives




2025-11-28

Sedition, the Oath, and the Power of My Vote

Sedition is not a vague construct; it has a clear meaning. 

It’s conduct or speech that incites rebellion against the authority of the government, often involving efforts to undermine or overthrow established constitutional order. In U.S. law, it’s treated as a serious crime, reflected in statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 2384, which addresses conspiracies to use force against the government or its laws.

With that in mind, let’s talk plainly about what happened on January 6, 2021.

On that day, the man who served as the 45th President stood before a crowd and told them, “If you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” Those words weren’t delivered in a vacuum. They came in the context of weeks of lies about a stolen election, directed at a crowd already primed to believe that their government had been illegitimately seized.

What followed was, in any ordinary sense of the word, a rebellion against the authority of the government: a mob storming the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to stop the lawful counting of electoral votes. That day was not a protest that got out of hand. It was an attempt, however chaotic and poorly organized, to derail a constitutional process by force and intimidation.

In my view, that’s exactly the kind of conduct people should have in mind when they use the word sedition.

A Second Injury: Pardoning the Rebellion

Fast-forward to the same individual now serving as the 47th President. One of his first acts in office was to pardon or commute the sentences of nearly 1,300 people convicted for their seditious roles in that assault on the Capitol, roughly half of whom were incarcerated at the time.

Think about what that says:

  • The attack was aimed at stopping a lawful constitutional process.
  • The people involved were investigated, charged, prosecuted, and convicted in courts of law.
  • Then, almost as soon as political power shifted back into the hands of the very man whose rhetoric fueled the attack, those convictions were wiped away or softened.

That may not be sedition in the strict technical, legal sense, but it absolutely undermines accountability for a violent attack on our democratic process. It sends a message that loyalty to one man is more important than loyalty to the Constitution and the rule of law. To me, that’s a second blow against our system—different in form, but similar in spirit to the first.

Lawful and Unlawful Orders: What the UCMJ Actually Says

Now we come to the latest twist. A small group of six members of Congress recently emphasized a very basic fact about military service:

Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), service members are obligated to obey lawful orders—and they are not obligated for carrying out unlawful ones. I
n fact they can be punished.

  • Article 92 criminalizes the failure` to obey lawful orders or regulations.
  • Article 90 criminalizes willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer—again, assuming the order is lawful.

Courts and military practice have long recognized that an order is lawful only if it:

  • Serves a valid military purpose,
  • Is clear and specific, and
  • Does not conflict with U.S. law or the Constitution.

This is not a radical idea; it’s basic military ethics and long-standing law. Service members are not supposed to be unthinking tools. They swear an oath to the Constitution, not to a particular president.

These members of Congress simply pointed out that if a president issues an illegal order, military members not only have no duty to follow it—they may have a duty to refuse. That’s not sedition. That’s a reminder of the legal and moral structure that keeps our military under constitutional control instead of personal control.

Yet the very same man who once incited a crowd that went on to attack the Capitol now wants to label this reminder as “sedition.” To me, that doesn’t reveal strength; it reveals fear—fear that someone might refuse to carry out an unlawful command.

The Oath: Bedrock of the Republic

Both military members and members of Congress swear an oath:

To support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

That oath is the bedrock of our democracy. It is not an oath of personal loyalty to a president, a party, or a movement. It is an oath to the Constitution itself.

So when elected officials or officers remind us that unlawful orders must not be followed, they are not undermining the country. They are doing exactly what their oath requires—insisting that no one, not even the president, stands above the law.

My Vote, My Voice

Here’s something else that doesn’t count as sedition: disagreeing with the current administration.

Having a different opinion than the president does not make me a “domestic enemy.” Criticizing decisions, policies, or rhetoric is not rebellion; it’s part of my duty as a citizen paying attention.

As a registered voter, I have a quiet but powerful tool:
I can walk into a polling place, step into a booth, and express my opinion in complete secrecy with my vote.

That vote:

  • Might be seen as a “threat” by those who want obedience instead of accountability.
  • Might upset those who prefer a strongman over a constitutional system.
  • Might annoy people who think loyalty to a leader should override loyalty to the law.

But in a healthy democracy, that’s exactly how it’s supposed to work.

My opinion, expressed through my ballot, is not sedition. It is my right, my responsibility, and one of the last clear ways I can say:

I stand with the Constitution, not with any one man.

And I intend to keep using that power as long as I draw breath.

So when a man who should easily have been convicted of sedition. Who has been convicted as a felon; decides to call people who are upholding their oaths, the UCMJ, and our Constitution, “seditious”, it lands like an insult to every one of us who ever swore an oath. In my opinion (and I’ve got plenty), we need more people who stand firmly to their oaths and the Constitution and a lot fewer folks like old Number 47 and his cadre of grifters...

2025-10-21

ANTIFA Really...

Re: On “designating Antifa” and claims about foreign-funded political violence

Thanks for writing. I have three concerns with your message: (1) it treats “Antifa” as a unitary group with command-and-control; (2) it asserts a domestic “terrorist organization” designation solves a legal problem it does not; and (3) it claims foreign financing of “Antifa” without evidence.

1) “Antifa” is not a singular organization

  • The FBI Director told Congress that “antifa is an ideology, not an organization.” That’s sworn testimony from Director Christopher Wray. AP News

  • Independent explainers (drawing on CRS and ADL) describe antifa as a decentralized movement with no formal leadership or hierarchy — loose networks and individuals, not a chartered group you can “list” like al-Qaeda. Reuters

When we pretend an amorphous tendency is a single, tightly run group, we invite both over-broad policing and sloppy intelligence work.

2) “Domestic terrorist organization” designations are not how U.S. law works

  • The State Department can designate Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) under the Immigration and Nationality Act. There is no parallel legal list for purely domestic groups. That’s why for years, experts across the spectrum explained the U.S. cannot simply “designate” a domestic movement. State Department

  • I recognize that, on Sept. 22, 2025, the White House announced an order purporting to designate “Antifa” as a domestic terrorist organization. But national-security law groups have already flagged that move as legally questionable, precisely because “Antifa” lacks organizational contours and U.S. law doesn’t provide a domestic-listing framework. Courts will ultimately decide the order’s effect. Reuters

If the goal is to prosecute violent crimes, existing federal and state statutes (weapons, conspiracy, arson, assault on federal officers, etc.) already provide ample authority — without bending designation law built for foreign groups.

3) “Foreign financiers” and organized funding claims require evidence — none has been shown

  • Repeated government briefings and reporting over the last several years have not substantiated claims that a centrally run “Antifa” receives foreign funding. Reuters’ backgrounders and FBI testimony stress the movement’s leaderless nature, which makes the “foreign financier” frame implausible without new, public evidence. Reuters

  • If there is credible, declassified evidence of foreign state financing of specific violent plots, it should be presented — not asserted. Absent that, claims of “foreign promotion of political violence” should focus on actual foreign actors (e.g., documented malign influence and election-interference efforts) rather than a domestic label. See ODNI/DHS/DOJ assessments on foreign interference: real, but distinct from your Antifa claim. intel.gov

4) Political violence isn’t owned by one ideology

  • High-quality datasets (CSIS) show the domestic terror landscape has varied over time and across motives; right-wing, left-wing, and jihadist-inspired actors have all committed violence. The consistent point is plurality, not monopoly by “antifa.” CSIS

  • During the 2020 protest wave, ACLED found the vast majority of demonstrations were peaceful; violent events were the exception — which argues for precise, offender-based prosecutions rather than movement-wide labeling. ACLED

5) Constructive next steps

  • Focus on chargeable conduct (assaults, weapons, arson, conspiracy) rather than a label so vague it sweeps in lawful dissent. That keeps prosecutions tight and constitutional. (See the legal critiques of the September 2025 order.) Brennan Center for Justice

  • If your office has specific intelligence indicating foreign state financing of identifiable U.S. violent plots, please release the unclassified basis or brief constituents with as much detail as possible. Otherwise, let’s not conflate online rumor with evidence. Reuters

I support vigorous prosecution of violence whoever commits it — left, right, or apolitical — and equally vigorous protection of peaceful speech and assembly. That approach is truer to the rule of law than trying to turn a diffuse ideology into a foreign terrorist organization.

2025-10-10

My Cousin Kent Christopher

 Kent Christopher passed away on Oct. 2nd.  You can read his obituary here 
(https://www.maupinfuneralhome.com/obituaries/Stephen-Kent-Christopher?obId=45814312#/obituaryInfo). His son, Shaun reached out to me and asked if I would be willing to speak about Kent during the funeral.  Here is what I came up with and of course there was some adlibbing, but this is very close to what I shared.

Remarks for Kent’s Funeral

I’m honored to be asked to share a few words about my cousin Kent. Please realize these are my recollections, and sometimes that doesn’t match anyone else’s reality.

When Shaun told me that Kent thought of me as a brother — I understood that completely. My Dad and three of his siblings each had just one child, so for me, my cousins weren’t just cousins. They were more like brothers and sisters.

Kent was four years younger than me — I’m 71 now — so we go way back. When we were boys, we spent a lot of time together… staying over at each other’s houses, wrestling, arguing, making each other mad — and just as quick, well not always just as quick, making up again. You know… brother stuff.

We both went to McIntire elementary school together for a little bit. Often we’d walk to my house after school. Kent’s family moved around a bit —Auxvasse, Effingham, and Oklahoma City as I recall — but we stayed close. I visited them wherever they were. And his mom, Ethel, well… she was like another mother to me.

One of my favorite memories goes back to the mid-sixties, when CB radios and walkie-talkies were all the rage. Kent and I decided we’d start our own radio station. We set up shop right there in the living room. I had a record player and a stack of 45s. We’d hold the walkie-talkie up to the speaker, play songs, make announcements, and even deliver “news.” We thought we were real DJs. Looking back, I think that might’ve been one of the happiest times we ever had together — just two kids with big imaginations having a blast.

Another memory was the summer of ’69. I went down to Oklahoma City to stay with them. Kent had this sweet little Yamaha motorcycle, and there was a spot nearby where we could ride, kinda like a dirt flat track. That summer, his folks — Richard and Ethel — took us on a road trip to California to visit family. We stopped in Las Vegas along the way, naturally, and checked out this brand-new casino called Circus Circus. My job was to keep an eye on Kent and stay out of trouble — I was 15, he was 11… neither job was easy! But we found the upper deck that had an arcade full of cheap games, and we thought we’d struck gold. The trip included Disneyland. It was a magical summer…

Life moved on, as it does. About seven years later, I left Missouri, and we didn’t see each other as much for a while. Kent became an over-the-road truck driver, got married, and had two wonderful children — Mary and Shaun. From what I saw family meant the world to him. Likewise I know he always carried a deep love for his mom, Ethel.

When I eventually moved back to Missouri, we started talking more often again. Our conversations were always a mix of catching up and storytelling. Kent had a mind like a steel trap — he could remember every name, every place, and every detail. I’ll admit, half the time I didn’t know who he was talking about! But that didn’t matter. He’d laugh when the story was funny, grumble when something got under his skin, and light up when he talked about his grandson, Sawyer. You could just hear how proud he was, how much he loved his family.

Now, Kent could be stubborn — and I say that with love. I read somewhere that stubbornness sometimes comes from fear, and maybe there’s truth in that. But it can also come from strength — from caring deeply, from wanting to do things the right way. That what I remember about Kent.

For much of my life, he was the closest thing I had to a brother. And I’m going to miss him — deeply.

But I take comfort in knowing that he’s now reunited with his mom and dad, and his Grandparents. I know he missed them terribly. And now they’re together again.

Rest easy, cousin. You’ll always be family — always my brother in spirit…


We drove down to Fulton today (10/10/25) for the graveside service. On the way I got a call from Shaun, the minister that officiated the Thursday night funeral service was having trouble with his powered wheel chair and couldn't get to the Central Christian Church graveyard.  Would I be willing to say a prayer.  The second time in less than 24 hours that I was given the gift of the chance to show up, much like the countless times Kent's Mom showed up for me.  What follows is what I could come up with between Williamsburg and the church.

Graveside Service for Kent

Good morning everyone.  I consider everyone here family and am honored to be asked to help. Thank you all for being here today as we lay Kent to rest. Your presence — family, friends, and those who knew him through the years — is a reminder of how many lives he touched.
We gather not just in grief, but in gratitude — for the time we had with him, and for the ways he made each of our lives a little better.

We gather not just in grief, but in gratitude — for the time we had with him, and for the ways he made each of our lives a little better..

Kent was a good man — steady, humble, and kind-hearted. He had that quiet strength that didn’t need to announce itself. The kind of man who’d show up when you needed help, stay until the job was done, and never expect a thank you. He had a quick wit and a soft heart — and somehow managed to be both practical and full of mischief at the same time.
Folks like Kent make the world better just by being themselves.

It's too long ago to pin down a time frame, but I probably wouldn't be as good a swimmer as I am without Kent.  One summer Ethel singed Kent up for the Red Cross swimming lessons at the city park pool.  As luck would have it, Kent had an accident and got some stitches in his knee.  Ethel asked if I wanted to take Kent's place and of course I jumped at the chance. I've never been overly fond of swimming, jumping into deep water still takes my breath away for a moment. Because of Kent, and Ethel, I can calm down and apply the knowledge that those lessons provided me.

Read the 23rd Psalm

As we say goodbye today, let’s hold on to those moments — the laughter, the work done side by side, the quiet talks. Kent’s gone from our sight, but not from our hearts.
And I believe he’s at peace — reunited with loved ones, free of pain, and resting in the care of a loving God.

I closed with the Lord's Prayer

2025-08-25

When Soldiers Patrol Main Street, Liberty Is Under Siege

I wore the uniform of this nation, served to the best of my ability. And in my years overseas, I saw what it looks like when armed soldiers stand on street corners with rifles at the ready. It does not protect the people—it frightens them. It does not symbolize freedom—it screams control. It is not safety—it is intimidation.

And now I see the same thing happening here, in the United States of America—the very land that claims to be “the land of the free.” Soldiers and military-grade weapons on our own streets. Let’s call it what it is: an attempt to cow the public into silence and submission.

This is not patriotism. This is not liberty. This is the ugly face of fear masquerading as security. We, the people, did not sacrifice generations of service and blood so that our cities could be turned into armed encampments.

Every rifle slung across a soldier’s chest on Main Street is a slap in the face to the Constitution. Every display of military force against citizens is a betrayal of the freedoms we swore to defend.

If we tolerate this, we are not “free.” We are being managed, manipulated, and kept in check by the very symbols of power that once stood as our defense. And let me be clear: there is no safety, no justice, and no future in an America that turns its military inward against its own people.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License
© Copyright 2008 by Larry Boy aka Dennis S.